Individual Liberty — Individual Responsibility 

20 Questions, in no particular order

How can you end racial discrimination by discriminating based upon race?

Isn't it obvious by now that the Democratic Party is right when they claim that Republican tax cuts are “tax cuts for the rich”? After all, who pays 97% of all income taxes in this country in the first place?

If the American people really want “honest” politicians, why do they continue to vote for people that lie with impunity about their records, cannot be faithful to their spouses, or get caught with bribe money in their freezers?

Why is it that politicians that cannot find anything good to say about America, and in fact often cannot keep from enumerating a long list of grievances about her, whether based in fact or not, complain when someone questions their patriotism?

How can a person claim to support “democracy” and refuse to allow an up-or-down vote on any topic, whether that topic is drilling for domestic oil or confirming judicial nominees?

Why is it that when the growth of spending upon government programs is reduced but not actually reversed, it's called a “spending cut”, sometimes qualified with the word “draconian”?

If the presumption in our legal system is “innocent until proven guilty” then upon what basis do some politicians demand the resignation of other politicians over mere accusations? (“It's not the nature of the evidence, it's the seriousness of the charge!”)

Since when did our unalienable rights, protected by the Constitution, include the right not to be offended?

How can a politician claim to seek an end to our dependence upon “foreign oil” and refuse to allow the development of domestic supplies?

Why is it that when the topic of balancing the budget comes up the proposed solutions always seem to be more taxes and not less spending?

Since when do the American people have a right to take the fruits of the labor of others  for nothing?

If, as Nancy Pelosi, and others tell us we cannot “drill our way out of” high fuel prices, then why do our congressmen insist upon resolutions “requiring” foreign nations, over whom they have no control, to drill more, now?

How does raising the cost of doing business promote job growth?

Is money in politics really bad or does the question really apply to specific cases? In other words, if a politician promotes ideas and policies that people agree with enough to want to support him isn't that good, while if people offer money to change a politician's ideas and policies isn't that bad, and don't you think that the sequence of events is likely to provide evidence of which is the case?

Which is better — to set high standards and fail to attain them despite your best efforts, or to set no standards and attain nothing?

In “documentary” programs illustrating the lives of animals, we are often told that predators tend to prey upon the weak and the infirm because they are “easier prey”. We are told that this ensures the “survival of the fittest”. Isn't the analogy to “gun control” laws obvious? If the question isn't clear, think of it this way — if the possession of guns is made illegal, what class of people will still possess them, and how will they use them? Still not clear? Then consider it this way — if you were a predator, would you prefer it if your prey were armed or unarmed?

Does it really make sense to “negotiate” with someone who has said that your very existence is anathema to them and has sworn to see you eradicated?

If someone threatens to destroy you, isn't it prudent to take them at their word, especially if they've done violence to you in the past?

Considering that our population continues to grow, isn't a growing economy a necessity if we are to maintain a high standard of living for all of our citizens? If our economy is static, and we have a growing population doesn't that mean that we have a declining standard of living? Doesn't this imply that anyone that wants to slow our economy down or that works against it wants to reduce our standard of living?

Finally, a question for conservatives in particular. Conservatism stands for limited government as a means to ensure our liberties. Conservatives like to remark upon the founders vision of a limited constitutional government, citing the Constitution and the Federalist Papers as references. I ask you — do you honestly believe that the Constitutional Convention was called with the purpose of limiting the powers of the federal government? Wasn't it really called to enlarge them? The men that wrote the Federalist Papers called themselves federalists, but wasn't it really the anti-federalists that really believed in federalism?

I ask this last, not because I don't believe in limited government — I do. Further, I truly believe that the Constitution, together with it's amendments defines the most perfect form of government that our world has ever seen. I believe that limitations on the power of the federal government are important to our future, and that we need to return to that ideal — but I also believe that our federal government was created for a reason, and that some of its powers are necessary. If we consider the question — did men like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton really seek a limited federal government, maybe we can understand how quickly the tensions between federal power and states rights developed.

Finally, here's a bonus question or two — which of the powers that our federal government exercises today really should belong to it, and which of the powers that our federal government exercises today ought to be re-claimed by the States and the people?

[Update: One more bonus question... If politicians from one party hold to a particular viewpoint regarding an issue while politicians from another party hold to a diametrically opposed viewpoint regarding the same issue — where is there room for compromise? Isn't it true in a case like this that one side or the other must be defeated and that for either side to compromise with the other they must surrender their principles?]

You'll note, that I'm not actually providing the answers to these questions in the post. I'm sure though that you can figure out from the way I ask them what I think. What do you think?

This linkfest is for the 12th of August, 2008. If you have something interesting you'd like to share, feel free to link it here and leave a trackback. Just remember the trackback policy.

For the best exposure, go to the blogger's oasis and use the linkfest chooser to choose the posts you'd like to hook up with.