For those we lost, We will not forget 09/11/2001 “Our God given unalienable rights are given to us all as individuals. They tell us what me may do for ourselves, and they are the embodiment of liberty. The so-called rights that government gives to some of us are parcelled out to select groups as classes. They tell us what one class of people may require another to do for them, and they are the very essence of slavery.”
— Perri Nelson, February 9, 2010

A bheil Gàidhlig agaibh?

A few more things


Published Mon, Jun 23 2008 8:28 AM

In my last post I outlined the major changes between the government that the founders intended and the one we have today. It was a long post. It also just barely managed to cover the ground that I intended it to cover. This post won't be nearly as long.

The founders worked hard to hammer out the compromises that went into our Constitution. Some of the prime movers wanted a strong federal government that would overshadow the states much as today's federal government does. They had to overcome strong opposition from a coalition of states that did not want their sovereignty reduced in any way, and they were only partially successful. Time, distance and stifling heat saw to it that from time to time the leaders of one faction or the other were absent. New coalitions were formed and broken. When they finally finished crafting the Constitution the hard work of ratifying it began.

Upon leaving the Constitutional Convention Benjamin Franklin was asked what sort of government had been given to the people. His reply was "A republic, if you can keep it." Keeping our republic is a challenge even today. The founders themselves didn't expect it to last more than a few decades. After all, the confederacy that preceded it didn't.

As I noted earlier, it didn't take too long for changes from the original design to creep in. Only a few years after the ratification of our Constitution power struggles between the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists provided the opportunity for the Supreme Court to seize upon a new power "to construe the laws according to the spirit of the Constitution". This is, supposedly the final check in our system of checks and balances.

The writers of the Constitution had given the executive and legislative branches powers that would limit each other as well as the judiciary branch. The Constitution gave Congress the power to impeach and remove officials, including judges or the President himself. The President was given the veto power to restrain Congress and the authority to appoint members of the Supreme Court with the advice and consent of the Senate. In this intricate system, the role of the Supreme Court had not been defined. It therefore fell to a strong Chief Justice like Marshall to complete the triangular structure of checks and balances by establishing the principle of judicial review.

"It therefore fell to a strong Chief Justice… to complete the triangular structure of checks and balances"? Hardly. This was a plain, non constitutional usurpation of power. It was the fulfillment of the prophecy of "Brutus" in the opening sentence of Antifederalist number 78

The supreme court under this constitution would be exalted above all other power in the government, and subject to no control.

We didn't keep our republic, it was taken from us by Chief Justice John Marshal and his court. The one branch of the government that is not accountable to the people and which is meant to have no legislative power at all took advantage of a loophole left in the Constitution to take over all government throughout the nation. We get to retain the illusion that we live in a republic, but we really live under an oligarchy. For the most part we hold to the forms, we elect Senators and Representatives, we elect those who will elect our President and Vice President, and together they enact our laws — until the courts step in.


Our Constitution granted to the government very specific powers and responsibilities. For the most part the government exercises those powers and carries out its responsibilities, although there have been lapses. The Constitution was structured to restrict the power of our federal government as well.

In that, it has failed, simply by not going far enough. Where the least specific definition of the powers and limitations of one of the branches was given, we've seen the result. The hierarchy of powers envisioned by the founders (and yes, it was a hierarchy, and not three co-equal branches) has been turned upside down.


The Constitution defines three branches of government, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial. That should be enough, or so you would think. It certainly would be enough if the government confined itself to the role envisioned for it by our founders.

Maybe next time I'll talk about the fourth branch of the federal government. I'll talk about the second unelected branch of government — the bureaucracy.


This linkfest is for the 23rd of June, 2008.

If you have something interesting you'd like to share, feel free to link it here and leave a trackback.

Just remember the trackback policy.

Get the code for this blogroll Open Trackback Alliance

For the best exposure, go to the blogger's oasis and use the linkfest chooser to choose the posts you'd like to hook up with.

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's Oasis


Trackback URI for this post: http://perrinelson.com/track.aspx?postid=1180
Permalink URI for this post: http://perrinelson.com/2008/6/23/1180.aspx


Planck's Constant trackbacked with "I have 7 Words for George Carlin who Died at 71"

George Carlin was outrageous, blasphemous, cynical, irreverent, hilarious and funny. He said the things that had to be said, even if they offended.

Mark My Words trackbacked with "Galileo Galilei, spinning in his grave"

Apparently a high priest of global warming caused by man, has made a new pronouncement.

123beta trackbacked with "Firefox Hack"

Nice simple hack to stop those annoying blinking ads ...

Adam's Blog trackbacked with "Possumus Obama"

Podcast Show Notes Obama’s slogan mangles Latin and reveals the weakness of his campaign. James Dobson takes on Barack Obama. Charlie Black of the McCain Campaign apologizes for saying a terror attack would benefit McCain, while the Obama McCain move...

Right Voices trackbacked with "WITHOUT NOTES TELLING HIM WHAT TO SAY, BARACK BUMBLES LEGAL QS"

And bumbles is being kind! In his ABC interview last Monday, for example, Obama attacked the Bush approach on fighting terror. He claimed that, in the case of “the first attack against the World Trade Center, we were able to arrest those respons...

Pirate's Cove trackbacked with "San Fran To Honor Dubya!"

Only in San Fran. Slow news day. SFGate: Satire at the ballot box to ‘honor’ Bush If you’ve attended an event or festival in San Francisco lately - or even just hung out at a city park - you’ve probably seen them. Admittedly, th...

The World According To Carl trackbacked with "George Carlin — 1937 - 2008 — R.I.P."

My favorite comedian of all time, George Carlin, passed away Sunday evening due to heart failure at a Los Angeles-area hospital on Sunday. He was 71. ...

The Amboy Times trackbacked with "Satire of a Hoax"

Last month I wrote a satire called Superior Carbon Neutral Humans Discovered. It was based on a BBC article that claimed that an undiscovered tribe was threatened by illegal logging. The joke was that a fictional scientist admires a the tribe's tiny carbon footprints so much that he deems the superior in their technological advancement.

Right Truth trackbacked with "PATIENT EVIL - An R.J. Godlewski / Right Truth Blog Exclusive - Chapter Seventeen"

Chapter Seventeen

Shadowscope trackbacked with "Blogs For Borders Video BlogBurst!"

I got this via email on Sunday night and just completely forgot to get it up...so without further ado here's this weeks Blogs for Borders video blogburst. Our weekly vlog -- podcast on illegal immigration and border security issues. In...

Democrat=Socialist trackbacked with "NEWS & OPINION ROUNDUP (24 JUNE 2008) THE PEACEFUL IRANIAN REGIME EDITION"

IAEA Director-General Dr. Muhammad Al-Baradei: Iran Can Produce Enough Enriched Uranium for a Nuclear Bomb in Six Months to a Year.  But in all honesty, if we just send Obamalord over to talk to them, it should all work out fine.   A complet...

third world county trackbacked with "“*heh*” of the day"

Why Settle for a Lesser Evil? ...

Democrat=Socialist trackbacked with "NEWS & OPINION ROUNDUP (25 JUNE 2008) ANIA EGLAND EDITION"

Remember the scummy ad from the MoveOn hacks with baby Alex?  Ania Egland, who grew up under communism sets the record straight. Chalk one up for feminazi’s across America.  Hillary ask a man to pay her bills.  Does this make Bill ...

The World According To Carl trackbacked with "Weird Product: Armadillo Handbag?"

Yesterday, my wife was shopping online for purses when she came upon this.er.unique item. ...

Stageleft:. Life on the left side trackbacked with "They’re Both Right"

It seems that both the Barack Obama and the John McCain campaigns have got themselves into a wee spot of bother - oddly enough, for speaking the truth. ...

Subscribe to this entry's comment feed. (Atom)

David responded with: Yes, and no...

Gravatar
"We didn't keep our republic, it was taken from us by Chief Justice John Marshal and his court."

OTOH, recall that Lincoln followed Jackson's example ("Justice Taney has his decision. Now let him enforce it.") *heh*) and refused to recognize some of the Taney Court's decisions--even going so far as to issue an arrest warrant for Chief Justice Taney, at one time.

The Supreme Court has only such power as the other two branches allow it, even today. Its power is largely a shared fiction, as it has no enforcement arm of its own.

Of course, as politics demonstrates over and over again, fictions have powers of their own...

David responded with: Yes, and no...

Gravatar
Oh, when you get to the bureaucracy, don't neglect "Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy" *heh*

Perri Nelson responded with:

Gravatar

"The Supreme Court has only such power as the other two branches allow it, even today."

True, but the other two branches have deferred to it for so long that it might as well be all powerful. No Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached, and even that ultimate remedy won't fix a bad decision. We've labored under bad decisions like Roe for so long that they've become enshrined in our national politics.

"Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy" mirrors my thoughts on the bureaucracy quite well… thanks for bringing that up. I'd never heard of it before. And it's a plainly visible fact that some of the federal bureaucracy has been working in its own interests and against the interests of the administration it's meant to serve. Career bureaucrats — I have the same reaction to them as you do when you type "politicians * spit *"

Perri Nelson responded with:

Gravatar

…You know… I kind of like Lincoln's attitude toward that decision. If only we had politicians these days that would stand up to bad law crafted by the courts. Now that would be something.

Layla responded with:

Gravatar
I happen to agree with you both and having studied Constitutional Law as a minor to my major or Journalism - you both have an excellent command of our Supreme Court system.

Suffice to say truly at the end of the day - most people really do not understand that our President has such limited power and this nation is truly governed by our Senate and Congress - but both branches are accountable to the Supreme Court.

Truly is is the Supreme Court at the end of the day that really wields the power and backbone of our nation.

BTW-I really felt bad Perri when you mentioned on my blog that nobody hardly reads your blog. That is sad because I have always found it informative and insightful.

I will try when I can to come by more often.

Layla responded with:

Gravatar
I have you listed on my Links page.

Perri Nelson responded with:

Gravatar

Layla,

I'm not really concerned about how many people read my blog, although like anyone else, I enjoy seeing it get traffic. What I'm really more concerned about is that it seems that many of the visitors don't actually read it and offer comments to open a discussion. That, and the ones that do tend to agree already with what I have to say.

What I really want is to carry on a conversation with my visitors. I'd like to talk to people that disagree with me, so that they can explain their reasoning and I can answer their disagreements. Hopefully, when that sort of conversation happens, both sides will grow.

Layla responded with:

Gravatar
Thanks for dropping in Perri! I appreciate the thoughts.

Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious 

Comments to this entry are closed.

View Perri Nelson's profile on LinkedIn I'm a proud friend of Israel! Are you? Republican National Committee