Perri Nelson's Website 

Weekend Open Trackbacks

---

Published Thu, Apr 26 2007 11:40 PM
Technorati Tags: Open Trackbacks

---

This open trackbacks post is for April 27 through 29, 2007.

If you have something interesting you'd like to share, feel free to link it here and leave a trackback.

Just remember the trackback policy.

For the best exposure, go to the blogger's oasis and use the linkfest chooser to choose the posts you'd like to hook up with.

---

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (40)

---

third world county trackbacked with "“…thought is half murdered…”"
The Florida Masochist trackbacked with "The Knucklehead of the Day award"
Big Dogs Weblog trackbacked with "It Ain’t Easy Being Green"
Toasted Bread trackbacked with "The situation in Ecuador is deteriorating day by d"
Right Truth trackbacked with "Caption Contest - And the winner is ..."
stikNstein....has no mercy trackbacked with "NEW STUDY TUESDAY, Meat will kill you…Embrace the Horror"
The Right Nation trackbacked with "Long Weekend (Open) Must-Read List"
The Amboy Times trackbacked with "Jihadis aspire to 'conquer France'"
Ask Andrea trackbacked with "Wrong Reason, Right Reason"
Faultline USA trackbacked with "Dhimmicratic Debate . . .Hillary shrill, Obama Unc"
Pirate's Cove trackbacked with "Pardon The Border Agents"
Renaissance Blogger trackbacked with "Kan U Spel Korektly"
Renaissance Blogger trackbacked with "What He Said Wasn’t What She Said"
The Uncooperative Blogger trackbacked with "he Uncooperative Radio Show! April 27, 28 and 29 2"
The American Israeli Patriot trackbacked with "Israel Holds Intensive Maneuvers"
The American Israeli Patriot trackbacked with "Condi Has Left The Building"
BlogForCox.com trackbacked with "Integrity: a forgotten word in Washington D.C."
Right Voices trackbacked with "Open Thread Open Trackback"
Woman Honor Thyself trackbacked with "Defunded,Defeatist DHimmicratS OpenTrackback Weekend"
theapp.net trackbacked with "Net Radio"
Blog @ MoreWhat.com trackbacked with "North American Union: Just Say No"
Shadowscope trackbacked with "Net Radio"
Maggie's Notebook trackbacked with "Judge Antonin Scalia Debates ACLU on Morality"
Planck's Constant trackbacked with "Muslim Entrepreneurs"
Church of Integrity trackbacked with "Church of Integrity"
The Florida Masochist trackbacked with "The Knucklehead of the Day award"
The American Israeli Patriot trackbacked with "Abbas Approved Hamas Independence Day Attack"
The American Israeli Patriot trackbacked with "Swiss To Host Hamas"
Blog @ MoreWhat.com trackbacked with "Gonzales v Carhart and Examining Pro-choice"
walls of the city trackbacked with "eeny, meeny, and miney (moe missed the train)"
Blue Star Chronicles trackbacked with "Egyptian Blogger Quits"
Blue Star Chronicles trackbacked with "Doll Face"
The Florida Masochist trackbacked with "The Knucklehead of the Day award"
of Bullets and Bibles trackbacked with "In Favor Of Gun Control?"
Pursuing Holiness trackbacked with "We Don’t Live In A Democracy"
Pursuing Holiness trackbacked with "War Reporting, Compare and Contrast"
Blog @ MoreWhat.com trackbacked with "Resume’ Padding for Fun and Profit"
Woman Honor Thyself trackbacked with "Jee-hadi Propaganda in VermonT..yay"
Woman Honor Thyself trackbacked with "Steel Rising at WTC"
Leaning Straight Up trackbacked with "EU makes an Environmental Oops: New ‘Green’ rules increase global warming and rainforest deforestation"

Whose war is it anyway?

---

Published Thu, Apr 26 2007 12:52 PM
Technorati Tags: News and Politics, War on Terror, Iraq

---

One of the big talking points on the left in the last couple of days is that the war in Iraq is a "War that should have never been waged at all." I heard this statement attributed to Jack Murtha on the radio this morning, but I can't find the quote online. I can find a quote from Barack Obama though: "We've got a war that should never have been authorized and should never have been waged,'' Obama said.

This is why I ask the question "Whose war is it anyway?"

The left is fond of calling this "Bush's War", but is it really his war? I don't recall him crafting the resolution to use force. I don't recall him being the one to vote for it in overwhelming numbers. That was both houses of Congress. They approved the AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002 (Public Law 107-243 -- Oct. 16, 2002).

I submit to you that this was a declaration of war as authorized by the Constitution, and that Congress exercised its power to declare war. Democratic Representatives and Senators authorized the war, together with the Republicans.

Further, Weapons of Mass Destruction were only one of many reasons for that authorization. Here's a list of the reasons:

• Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors.
• Public Law 105-235 (August 14, 1998) declared Iraq to be in "material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations".
• Iraq persisted in violating resolutions of the U.N. Security Council by "continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace".
• Iraq refused to "release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman".
• Iraq refused to return "property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait"
• The Iraqi regime used "weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people". 
• Iraq attempted to assassinate a former President of the United States in 1993.
• On "many thousands of occasions" Iraq fired upon "United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council".

The list goes on, including citations to specific U.N. Security Council resolutions and U.S. Laws passed long before the authorization to use military force. One U.S. Law cited is Public Law 105-238, also known as the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. This particular law:

expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

I submit to you therefore, that the Iraq war is not a "war that should never have been authorized and should never have been waged". I submit to you that in urging the Congress to authorize the use of force against Iraq, the President was merely doing his duty as specified in the Constitution to execute the laws of the United States.

This is not "Bush's War", it's "Congress' War". Congress declared war in accordance with the Constitution, and the waging of the war has been in accordance with the Constitution and with the authorization to use force. Let's look a little deeper shall we?

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to—
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

This doesn't say "As Barack Obama determines to be appropriate". It doesn't say "As Jack Murtha determines to be appropriate". It doesn't say "As Nancy Pelosi determines to be appropriate." Nor does it say "As long as Harry Reid believes that the war isn't a 'lost cause'."

(c) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.—Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.

This was a declaration of war. By declaring war Congress made it not "Bush's War", but "Congress' War.

I find it strange that our Congress would declare war, authorize and fund the war and then, before the war is concluded declare the war to be lost, and quit the field of battle without realizing that when you start a fight, walking away is likely to end up with the enemy shooting you in the back.

Congress may have the power to begin a war, but Congress does not have the power to end a war. Wars don't end unless one side or the other is defeated. Wars don't end because you "walk away", they end because the opponents negotiate a surrender or a cease-fire. Walking away from Iraq won't end the aggression against the United States in the global war on terror (yes, it's still a war on terror, as authorized by Public Law 107-40, regardless of whether Democratic members of Congress want to use the term or not). Instead it will embolden the enemy to bring the fight to us.

The power to negotiate treaties, and I submit to you that a surrender or cease-fire agreement qualifies as a treaty, does not reside with Congress. The power to negotiate treaties belongs to the President of the United States, with the Advise and Consent of the Senate.

Timetables for withdrawal established by the Congress are an infringement upon the Constitutional authority of the President. Tying war funding to such timetables is a cowardly way to ensure the defeat of the United States Armed Forces by denying them food, armor, and ammunition, the tools needed to win the war that Congress authorized.

All of the political posturing by Democratic representatives and Senators assumes that the American people have short memories. It assumes that we don't have access to public records. It assumes that we are ignorant dolts easily led to believe that these so-called leaders weren't the ones that got us into this war.

While there have been many mistakes made in Iraq, the fighting there was duly authorized by Congress. Today's claims by the left that this is "Bush's War" and that it should never have been authorized are simply attempts to discredit the administration and to deflect criticism from themselves to the President, a man that is simply doing his duty as the commander of our military and our chief executive.

---

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)

Thursday Thirteen -- #1

---

Published Thu, Apr 26 2007 12:24 AM

---

Thirteen Things about Perri Nelson

1..... I'm a male.
2..... I was born on the 172nd anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution!
3..... I'm 47.
4..... I was born in Alaska.
5..... As a young child I lived in Ankara, Turkey.
6..... I graduated from High School in Melbourne, Florida.
7..... I have a B.S. in Mathematics from Rollins College in Winter Park, Florida.
8..... I've been a computer programmer/software developer/software engineer for 25 years, but I've never had any formal computer science education.
9..... I worked for Microsoft for seven years.
10... My favorite cars are Corvettes, but I drive a Chrysler every day and I have a Ford Truck.
11... My favorite things outside of my family are playing with computers and drag racing. Photography, camping and fishing follow closely behind.
12... I'm married to a wonderful woman and have two kids, my stepson and my son.
13... My family spoils me mercilessly.

Links to other Thursday Thirteens! (My trackback filter won't let you trackback unless you link to this post, so you can leave a comment I will add you as I get time today.):

1. Eric -- Renaissance Blogger

2. David -- Third world county.

Get the Thursday Thirteen code here!

The purpose of the meme is to get to know everyone who participates a little bit better every Thursday. Visiting fellow Thirteeners is encouraged! If you participate, leave the link to your Thirteen in others comments. It’s easy, and fun! Be sure to update your Thirteen with links that are left for you, as well! I will link to everyone who participates and leaves a link to their 13 things. Trackbacks, pings, comment links accepted!
View More Thursday Thirteen Participants

---

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)