For those we lost, We will not forget 09/11/2001 “The task of statesmanship has always been the re-definition of these rights in terms of a changing and growing social order.”
— Franklin D. Roosevelt (Commonwealth Club Address, 1932)

“Roosevelt was wrong! The principles laid down in the Declaration of Independence are the principles of individual liberty. Our unalienable rights, given to us by God are given to us as individuals. Our rights do not come from society or the government, and they cannot be redefined by politicians. The nature of these rights carries with it the implication of individual responsibility, without which we surrender them.”
— Perri Nelson, November 6, 2008

A bheil Gàidhlig agaibh?

Seattle City Council among reasons viaduct cost could rise


Published Tue, Nov 21 2006 3:10 PM
Technorati Tags: News and Politics, Transportation

The last time the estimated cost replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a tunnel rose the Seattle City Council decided that voters weren't smart enough to decide for themselves how they wanted the viaduct replaced. Now the estimated cost looks to be rising yet again.

Most of the city council wants a tunnel, and so does Mayor Nickels. This despite the enormous cost overruns that have been associated with tunnel projects in the past, most notably the infamous "big dig".

One significant reason why the cost might go up is the Seattle City Council themselves. The city passed an ordinance declaring an elevated viaduct inconsistent with its comprehensive plan and with height and usage regulations. Of course that ordinance fits in nicely with their plans to soak us for a tunnel anyway.

With the city council leaving threats on the table to stall the project with lawsuits and bureaucratic nonsense the cost of the 2.8 billion elevated replacement could rise even higher than the currently estimated cost of the tunnel.

The Seattle Times has more.

Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels and most of the Seattle City Council want a tunnel. Key state legislators from Seattle support a new aerial structure.

...

With the cost estimated at $2.8 billion, the elevated structure is a cheaper choice and would cause less disruption during construction; the $4.6 billion tunnel option would open up views of Elliott Bay and reconnect downtown to the waterfront.

...

The city has said it could inflate the $2.8 billion cost of an elevated viaduct to nearly $5 billion by slowing permits, filing lawsuits and using other tactics to oppose the project.

We certainly don't need a tunnel at a cost of $4.6 billion. The Boston "big dig" tunnel overran its budget by $11 billion. What we also don't need is a petulant city council that decides to stall and otherwise block a project just because they didn't get their way.

But that's what they've threatened.


Cross posted at NWBloggers.com.


Trackback URI for this post: http://perrinelson.com/track.aspx?postid=170
Permalink URI for this post: http://perrinelson.com/2006/11/21/170.aspx


Subscribe to this entry's comment feed. (Atom)

Beach Girl responded with:

Gravatar
Just tried sitemeter and seems to be back.

Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious 

Comments to this entry are closed.

View Perri Nelson's profile on LinkedIn I'm a proud friend of Israel! Are you? Republican National Committee