For those we lost, We will not forget 09/11/2001 “Our God given unalienable rights are given to us all as individuals. They tell us what we may do for ourselves, and they are the embodiment of liberty. The so-called rights that government gives to some of us are parcelled out to select groups as classes. They tell us what one class of people may require another to do for them, and they are the very essence of slavery.”
— Perri Nelson, February 9, 2010

A bheil Gàidhlig agaibh?

Seattle City Council among reasons viaduct cost could rise


Published Tue, Nov 21 2006 3:10 PM
Technorati Tags: News and Politics, Transportation

The last time the estimated cost replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a tunnel rose the Seattle City Council decided that voters weren't smart enough to decide for themselves how they wanted the viaduct replaced. Now the estimated cost looks to be rising yet again.

Most of the city council wants a tunnel, and so does Mayor Nickels. This despite the enormous cost overruns that have been associated with tunnel projects in the past, most notably the infamous "big dig".

One significant reason why the cost might go up is the Seattle City Council themselves. The city passed an ordinance declaring an elevated viaduct inconsistent with its comprehensive plan and with height and usage regulations. Of course that ordinance fits in nicely with their plans to soak us for a tunnel anyway.

With the city council leaving threats on the table to stall the project with lawsuits and bureaucratic nonsense the cost of the 2.8 billion elevated replacement could rise even higher than the currently estimated cost of the tunnel.

The Seattle Times has more.

Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels and most of the Seattle City Council want a tunnel. Key state legislators from Seattle support a new aerial structure.

...

With the cost estimated at $2.8 billion, the elevated structure is a cheaper choice and would cause less disruption during construction; the $4.6 billion tunnel option would open up views of Elliott Bay and reconnect downtown to the waterfront.

...

The city has said it could inflate the $2.8 billion cost of an elevated viaduct to nearly $5 billion by slowing permits, filing lawsuits and using other tactics to oppose the project.

We certainly don't need a tunnel at a cost of $4.6 billion. The Boston "big dig" tunnel overran its budget by $11 billion. What we also don't need is a petulant city council that decides to stall and otherwise block a project just because they didn't get their way.

But that's what they've threatened.


Cross posted at NWBloggers.com.


Trackback URI for this post: http://perrinelson.com/track.aspx?postid=170
Permalink URI for this post: http://perrinelson.com/2006/11/21/170.aspx


Subscribe to this entry's comment feed. (Atom)

Beach Girl responded with:

Gravatar
Just tried sitemeter and seems to be back.

Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious 

Comments to this entry are closed.

View Perri Nelson's profile on LinkedIn I'm a proud friend of Israel! Are you? Republican National Committee